Hi Amselfass,
Of course, I recommended SugarSync from my personal angle of view, personal ease of use/interface preferences, and surely what can be done with iPhone 3Gs via native/dedicated application from SugarSync (a free app from AppleStore), with less cluttered/intuitive interface on it, à la Apple style.
Personally, *after* iPhone/Blackberry support, the main criteria of choice is, at SugarSync, you may add to the system "whatever" folder you want, to continuously synchronize them. At DropBox, there is only one single satellite folder instead. Not a very distinctive feature however. As I am not a Linux people, another argument for DropBox did not impress me either.
If not already done, a Google search on Dropbox vs SugarSync, will yield many results, from Software+System+Usage reviews to personal impressions at many blogsites. From there, one may conclude also,
-This storage+sync at internet cloud thingie is very trendy, and beside many other systems, DropBox and SugarSync are two main actors in the sector.
-As another debate like Intel vs AMD, NVidia vs AtiAMD, Nokia vs iPhone... there is another _winner incertain_ debate between discussions on this two system 'providers'.
In a very simplified bottom line, Drop is favoured for its still easiness of use (especially on Mac, integration to Finder) while Sugar is shining for its more elaborated Mobile/Phone support. And as already known, both systems are constantly developed at nearly monthly basis, as this made the choice difficult for dedicated user. The price/storage ratio is another domain to make the final decision even more difficult, as recently SugarSync seemed more advantageous while examining their options.
MoS
Inventor of the "Turkish Building Technique"
Game Ratings:
First time total population beyond 3Mio frontier:3 045 259
Current Game:
andof course..
Verloren ist nur, wer sich selbst aufgibt.
Lost are only those, who abandon themselves.